Proposition O

Additional Parcel Tax for City College

Click here to create an account and save your votes.

Would impose an additional parcel tax on San Francisco property owners beginning July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2048 to help fund the City College. Proposition O requires a simple majority (50% + 1) to pass.

Fiscal Impact: Would, based on currently available parcel data, generate approximately $37 million annually, and would increase over time as the per parcel rates are adjusted for inflation each year.

Details

Pro/Con
Pro: 

Proponents of Proposition O argue that it is the ultimate in economic recorvery: it opens doors for better jobs for all San Franciscans at City Coftege, and the City College serves tens of thousands of students annually, providing an affordable· opportunity to earn degrees and receive valuable workforce training fur careers in nursing, firefighting, engineering/ technology, custodial work and construction—the jobs that make our city work. They argue the City College also provides critical wraparound support services in counseling, job placement, and mental health.

A YES vote on this measure means: An additional parcel tax would be imposed on San Francisco property owners beginning July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2048 to help fund the City College.

SFWercs.com (Campaign Website)

Con: 

Opponents of Proposition O argue that San Franciscans have repeatedly been asked to tax themselves to save City College from terrible fiscal mismanagement and oversight, and we've given them the resources and the funding, but City College still can't manage their finances or turn their organization around. They argue that it's time that the citizens of San Francisco stop approving blank-check funding for a failing organization.

A NO vote on this measure means: An additional parcel tax would not be imposed on San Francisco property owners beginning July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2048 to help fund the City College.

In Depth

 The Way It Is Now 

City College of San Francisco (“City College”) is a public, two-year community college. City College receives funding from the state, the federal government and the City. 

San Francisco property owners pay an annual flat tax of $99 per parcel to help fund City College. The revenues from this existing tax pay for teachers, libraries and counselors, among other uses. This parcel tax will expire on June 30, 2032. 

State law limits the amount of revenue, including tax revenue, that the City can spend each year. State law authorizes San Francisco voters to approve increases to this limit for up to four years. 

The Proposal 

The proposal would impose an additional parcel tax on San Francisco property owners beginning on July 1, 2023 and continuing until June 30, 2043. The tax would be adjusted annually for inflation. The proposed 2023 tax rates would be: 

 Property Type 

Rate 

Single Family Residential 

$150 

Residential – One Residential Unit 

$150 

Residential – Two or more Residential Units 

$75 per unit 

Non-Residential, under 5,000 Square Feet 

$150 

Non-Residential, 5,000 – 24,999 Square Feet 

$1,250 

Non-Residential, 25,000 – 100,000 Square Feet 

$2,500 

Non-Residential, over 100,000 Square Feet 

$4,000 

 

The rates are based on the square footage of the buildings, or if undeveloped, on the square footage of the parcel. For properties with mixed residential and commercial uses, different rates would apply according to the uses. 

The tax would not apply to two types of properties: 

  1. properties in which a person who is at least 65 years old before July 1 of the fiscal year has an ownership interest and also resides at that property; and 
  2. properties not required to pay standard property taxes, such as parcels owned and used by certain non-profits.

The proposal would require the City to collect and transfer all revenue from the additional parcel tax to City College. City College must use these tax revenues for the following purposes:

  • 25% for services and programs that support student enrollment, basic needs, retention and job placement; 
  • 25% for programs that address basic-skills needs, including supporting English proficiency and technology use and obtaining United States citizenship; 
  • 25% for workforce development programs that support job training and placement; and
  • 25% for programs that support the academic success and leadership development of historically underrepresented students. 

Before receiving these tax revenues, City College must submit an expenditure plan to the Mayor and the Board of Supervisors. 

The proposal would also require the City Controller to perform annual audits for the first five years of the tax and periodically after. The Mayor or Board of Supervisors may suspend disbursements of revenues from the additional tax to City College, if City College has not adopted the Controller’s audit recommendations. 

The proposal would require City College to establish an independent oversight committee to ensure that the tax revenues are used only for the designated purposes. 

This proposal would increase the City’s spending limit for four years. 

Source: Title and Summary of Proposition O

Voter Resources
Share |