Prop. 19 | Prop. 20 | Prop. 21 | Prop. 22 | Prop. 23 | Prop. 24 | Prop. 25 | Prop. 26 | Prop. 27
PROP
21
Increase vehicle license fees to fund state parks

An $18 annual surcharge would be added to the amount paid when a person registers a motor vehicle. The surcharge revenues would be deposited in a trust fund to be used solely for operating, maintaining, and repairing state parks, and protecting wildlife and natural resources. Vehicle owners who had paid the surcharge would have free admission and parking at all state parks.

Official Election Results:

Yes: 4,190,643 [42.7%]
No: 5,615,595 [57.3%]

Pro / Con

PRO 

Supporters say that Prop. 21 addresses the problem of deferred maintenance and repair at California’s state parks caused by chronic underfunding, by establishing a reliable source of funding to keep them adequately maintained and prevent park closures.

Supporters

California State Parks Foundation

Audubon California

California State Park Rangers Association

YES for State Parks - California State Parks Initiative

CON 

Opponents say that Prop. 21 is essentially a means of implementing a new car tax. They assert that it would allow existing park funds to be diverted to other programs.

Opponents

Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association

California Taxpayers Association

Americans for Prosperity

Vote No on 21

Polling

Polling

Coming Soon!

In-Depth

In-Depth

California has 278 state parks, of which 246 are operated and maintained by the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) and 32 by local entities. Other state departments, such as the Department of Fish and Game (DFG) and various state conservancies, own and maintain other lands for wildlife conservation purposes.

Giant Sequoias

State funding for the operation of state parks has averaged around $300 million annually over the past 5 years. Approximately half of this funding has come from the General Fund, with the remainder coming mostly from park user fees and state gasoline tax revenues.

Capital improvements to existing parks and the development of new state parks are largely funded by voter-approved bond funds. There is no dedicated annual funding source for state park maintenance projects, of which there is now a significant backlog.

Last year, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger proposed shutting down 220 state parks as part of an effort to resolve the state budget crisis. The closures were averted, but other funding cuts have left the parks system in critical condition. Many parks now have reduced operating hours, are open fewer days and have delayed maintenance. Sixty parks were partially closed over the last year, with another 90 suffering service reductions, resulting in leaky roofs and unkempt trails throughout the state.

Proposition 21 would add an $18 annual surcharge on all vehicles (except for commercial vehicles, trailers, and trailer coaches) registered on or after January 1, 2011. The DMV would collect the surcharge when annual vehicle registration fees are paid. These surcharge revenues would be deposited into a "State Parks and Wildlife Conservation Trust Fund" for the sole use of state parks and wildlife.

The Legislative Analyst's Office estimates that the fee will net revenues of $500 million. After offsetting some existing funding sources, these revenues would provide at least $250 million more annually for state parks and wildlife conservation.

The measure allows up to 1 percent of the surcharge revenue to be used for administering the trust fund. The Department of Parks and Recreation would receive 85% of the funds for the operations, maintenance, and development of the state parks system.

The surcharge payment would exempt vehicles from day-use fees, which range from $10 to $15, at all state parks (including state parks currently operated by local entities) as well as to other specified state lands and wildlife areas.

Voter Resources

Voter Resources

Official CA Documents

Official Voter Information Guide

Campaign Finance Information

Cal-Access General

Committees formed to support or oppose the ballot measure

Cal-Access Ballot Measure Summary Data Search 
[Select General 02 November 2010 and Proposition 020.]

Cal-Access provides financial information supplied by state candidates, donors, lobbyists, and others.

Nonpartisan Analyses

Ballotpedia

Pros & Cons (League of Women Voters)

Reports and Studies

Proposition 21: Should California Impose a Vehicle Surcharge To Fund the State Park System? California Budget Project Budget Brief, September 2010.

Multimedia

Multimedia

Supporters

Opponents

Non-partisan

Endorsements

Endorsements
News and Opinion
Updated: 0 sec ago

Rehoboth employees, residents worry about jobs, town services after override rejected

Wed, 2014-07-16 20:44
REHOBOTH — Rehoboth government is now working to address a nearly $1.7 million budget shortfall after the failure of a Proposition 2½½ vote on Tuesday that would have filled the gap left by a ...

Rehoboth residents reject Proposition 2 1/2 override

Tue, 2014-07-15 20:58
Marc Larocquemlarocque@tauntongazette.comREHOBOTH ­ Rehoboth town government services will be stripped down to the bare essentials after voters rejected a nearly $1.7 million Proposition 2½½ ...

Rehoboth faces controversial but crucial Proposition 2 1/2 override vote

Mon, 2014-06-30 20:38
A Rehoboth referendum that could leave town government in tatters is two weeks away.The townwide election on July 15 from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. has a single question: whether to fund a $1.7 million ...